The Handmaid's Tale's: Restless Modernity by Julius H. Grey
/ July 13, 2004
Version française...
La Scena Musicale takes you to the
opera!
The Canadian Opera Company presents the Canadian
premiere of composer Poul Ruders The Handmaid's Tale in September / October
2004; the libretto by Paul Bentley is based on the novel by Margaret
Atwood.
The critically acclaimed 2000 world premiere by
the Royal Danish Theatre was released on Dacapo records and
is distributed in Canada by
Naxos.
Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale is
one of the best and most chilling of "dystopian" novels, a genre that includes
such masterpieces as Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, George Orwell's 1984, and
Jean-Christophe Ruffin's Globalia. These works tell of worlds existing in
the not-too-distant future that are entirely unappealing in terms of their
political scenarios. Unlike works of science fiction, these novels concentrate
on political and social evolution and the fragility of our notions of individual
freedom rather than technological advances. The Handmaid's Tale is
particularly powerful as an indictment of America's Christian right and a
warning about possible reactions against feminism and secularism. It sends a
shiver down one's spine to learn that a novel written 15 years ago had foreseen
the imposition of tyranny through emergency laws promulgated as a reaction to
acts of terrorism.
Yet The Handmaid's Tale is more than a
political parable. It is a novel of dark romanticism, sexual desire in a bleak
universe, friendship, and resistance.
The heroine, whose real name we never learn, has
lost everything--her daughter, her husband, and her freedom. In the course of
several months her universe has fallen apart and she has become a procreative
tool for the sons of Jacob, leaders of the religious-fascist Republic of Gilead,
which has replaced the secular United States. Through her eyes the reader sees
the leaders of the new regime, the collaborators, and the shadowy but
irrepressible resistance. She continues to yearn, to desire, and to think, and
in the course of the story her daydreams solidify into defiance, resistance, and
escape.
It is a particularly poignant aspect of the novel
that the time separating Gilead from our own epoch is so very short. Only a few
years earlier, the heroine had been living a normal, middle-class life. The past
is constantly present in her thoughts, as she moves from the harsh reality of
Gilead to the refuge of her earlier life with a facility that can only be
explained by their temporal proximity. It is difficult for the reader to escape
the fear that a political catastrophe could happen so suddenly and decisively.
One detail is particularly chilling: the imposition of the new repression of
women happens in one day when their credit cards become invalid. The
centralization of data through computer technology makes this type of state
action entirely plausible and, indeed, fears of loss of all privacy through the
monitoring of credit cards have become common in recent years. Atwood showed
keen foresight in imagining such events 15 years ago!
One of the novel's greatest strengths is the depth
of characterization. The people associated with the regime, like the commander
and his wife, are not cardboard villains but living individuals, subject to
desire and envy, and are even nostalgic for a gentler past. The sexual desires
and repression apply as much to the rulers of Gilead as to its victims, and this
makes the characters all the more credible. Nor is the resistance composed of
intrepid heroes and heroines, but of imperfect and frightened persons who learn
to reach out to each other and find courage.
Despite a deeply passionate atmosphere and style,
mordant humour is not absent from the work. It is present in the chapters
dealing with social scientists who describe the Gileadan regime after its fall
in typically pseudo-scientific language, entirely without the moral indignation
the regime merited; and, more wickedly, in the numerous passages where
government agents use modern feminist jargon to justify the repression of the
women under their care. This was perhaps a warning about the abuse of language,
a topic that so far has not been fully appreciated.
Yet, despite such fleeting humour, the overall
impression of the society of Gilead is that of a nightmare of fear, repression,
cruelty, and injustice. For instance, there is the routine use of capital
punishment carried out by the regime. Intermittent moments where life, streets,
and people appear normal or familiar serve only to underscore the
horror.
One can draw parallels between The Handmaid's
Tale and a darkly passionate literary and artistic movement in early 20th
century Europe: Expressionism. Expressionist works such as Lulu were
often successfully adapted to the operatic stage and it is therefore not
surprising that The Handmaid's Tale, with its powerful political message,
its emotional intensity, and its pervasive sexuality, has also been turned into
a libretto. Librettist Paul Bentley's adaptation is very faithful to the novel;
indeed, as the novel employs considerable dialogue, many of the passages are
taken directly from Atwood's text.
With The Handmaid's Tale, Atwood has
produced one of the unquestionable masterpieces of Canadian literature. Although
the novel takes place in the United States, among Americans, Canada is
constantly present, both as the distant beacon to which one can try to escape,
and more subtly as a vantage point. The Republic of Gilead and its religious
oppression represent a very Canadian fear of certain American trends. But in the
end, both the political analysis and the passion are universal, and this
explains the novel's popularity throughout the world.
Version française... |
|